Correspondences World Leaders
Japan should withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN), WHO's controlling parent body, to protect the basic human rights and lives of its citizens.
Your Majesties,
I am a citizen of Japan, writing to request the government of Japan to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN), WHO's controlling parent body, to protect the basic human rights and lives of its citizens.
Your Majesties,
I am a citizen of Japan, writing to request the government of Japan to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN), WHO's controlling parent body, to protect the basic human rights and lives of its citizens. WHO demonstrated its pervasive, systemic incompetence through its disastrous overreach and failures during the COVID "pandemic." Withholding early treatment resulted in unknown numbers of preventable deaths. Disastrous, unscientific lockdowns, masking, fraudulent tests and dangerous "vaccines" violated scientific logic, medical ethics and personal autonomy. Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) adopted May 27, 2022 do not require national ratification. Unless we exercise our explicit right of rejection prior the end of November, 2023, we will be bound by these amendments. NON member nations are NOT so bound, making our withdrawal imperative. WHO's Working Group for amendments to the IHR is secretly negotiating an additional 300+ amendments, which would transform WHO from a health-focused advisory body to a controlling one with legally binding, dictatorial powers threatening health, personal and national sovereignty, removing all references to human rights, fundamental freedoms and dignity. WHO's IHR Review Committee (IHRRC) Final Report1 states: “This Committee is concerned that these proposals may unduly impinge on the sovereignty of States Parties and give binding effects to what are supposed to be recommendations.” (page 68) WHO's Constitution (Article 21) limits its authority to adopting regulations in just 5 categories. Many of the proposed amendments far exceed those limitations. Additionally, the proposed amendments would vest all authority in WHO's Director-General, giving him/her absolute, unchallengeable power over freedom of movement, travel, health, forced medical treatments, digital IDs/Health Certificates, manufacturing, economic activity, etc. Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus orchestrated the well-documented genocide of more than one million Ethiopians.2 We would be compelled to enact legislation to implement all WHO / IHR mandates in violation of our sovereignty, superseding our existing laws. WHO intends to introduce 500 novel mandatory vaccines3,4 by the year 2030 and seeks total control over every living organism under its “One Health” approach.5 Fundamentally compromised, WHO serves the special interests of its institutional and commercial funders.
1 https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_5-en.pdf
2 https://preventgenocide2030.org/tedros
3 https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/strategies/ia2030
5 https://www.who.int/teams/one-health-initiative
Continued membership in WHO and the UN represents a clear and present danger to our well being and sovereignty.
I look forward to your leadership in spearheading our expeditious withdrawal from both organizations.
A citizen of Japan.
LATEST OPEN LETTERS
-
20-03Stand up to Trump
-
18-02Average Americans Response
-
23-12Tens of thousands of dead children.......this must stop
-
05-06A Call to Action: Uniting for a Lasting Peace in the Holy Land
-
28-05Concerned world citizen
-
13-02World Peace
-
05-12My scream to the world
-
16-11To Syria and Bashar al-Assad
-
16-11To Palestine
-
24-10Japan should withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN), WHO's controlling parent body, to protect the basic human rights and lives of its citizens.
VIRTUAL POST OFFICE
PETITIONS
LINKS
DONATION
Latest Blog Articles
-
31-03The Evangelical Pope | You Want Peace?
-
26-03Our Wednesday News Analysis | Would it be okay for Hamas to strike a hospital treating Benjamin Netanyahu?
-
25-03Would it be okay for Hamas to strike a hospital treating Benjamin Netanyahu?
-
25-03'The occupation wants nothing but suffering for us': Gazans face catastrophic humanitarian crisis amid Israel's Ramadan blockade
-
25-03Opinion | It Doesn't Matter What the UN Report on Gaza Says. Israel Will Ignore It Anyway
-
24-03The Evangelical Pope | Love Conquers Sin
-
20-03Our Friday News Analysis | What the World Reads Now!
-
19-03Our Wednesday News Analysis | Palestine question a key test of US foreign policy
-
18-03Palestine question a key test of US foreign policy
-
18-03'Our enemies commit genocide, not our friends': Leading genocide scholar and lawyer William Schabas on the double standards of calling out Israel's horrific crimes in Gaza
-
18-03Opinion | In the End, Hamas Remains
Latest Comments
One of the most important and illuminating articles that I …
Comment by Benjamin InbarajAnd what's wrong here? After all, there is the homeland …
Comment by Isac BoianDoes this reinforce or deny my argument that Israel is …
Comment by Edward CampbellMany 'say' they support the Palestinian cause but do little …
Comment by Philip McFedriesThe UN is strangled by the "war for profit" cabal …
Comment by Philip McFedriesI can't read the printing on the map.
Comment by Philip McFedriesGood news!
Comment by Philip McFedries
COMMENTS
This article has 0 comments at this time. We invoke you to participate the discussion and leave your comment below. Share your opinion and let the world know.