The Friday Edition
US Senators Move to Protect Victims of Palestinian Terror
Source: Shurat HaDin - Israel Law Center
US Senators and Congressional Representatives are Moving in Support of the Terror Victims' Case Against the Palestinians.
In February 2015, Shurat HaDin helped litigate a historic 7 week long trial, Sokolow v. PLO, in the New York federal court against the Palestinian Authority and terrorist PLO. Shurat HaDin brought the case on behalf of 10 families of victims who had loved ones killed or maimed during the Second Intifada violence. The jury delivered a unanimous 24 count guilty verdict against the defendants finding them liable for the shootings and suicide bombings perpetrated by the Palestinian police forces. The case is on appeal to the US Supreme Court and the justices have asked the Trump Administration for its position on the matter.
These elected officials are leading the campaign on Capital Hill to support the terror victims in their pursuit of justice against the Palestinians:
RUBIO, GRASSLEY LEAD CALL FOR ADMINISTRATION TO PROTECT AMERICAN VICTIMS OF PALESTINIAN TERRORISM
Washington, D.C.– U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) joined Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) in leading 24 senators to urge the administration to provide its views to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Sokolow v. PLO case involving American victims of Palestinian terrorist attacks occurring in Israel in the early 2000s. The Supreme Court is currently considering whether to hear the case.
Led also by Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Chris Coons (D-DE), the bipartisan Senate letter comes after Rubio joined Grassley and other senators in filing an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs’ petition for certiorari in Sokolow v. PLO in April. The Senate amicus brief urges the Supreme Court to review a federal appeals court decision undermining the ability of U.S. victims of international terrorism to seek justice. The appeals court’s decision effectively nullified the Antiterrorism Act of 1992, a law passed by Congress specifically intended to protect Americans abroad and to provide victims with a tool to bring terrorists to justice in U.S. courts.
In 2004, American victims sued the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Palestinian Authority (PA) under the Antiterrorism Act to recover damages. In 2015, after more than a decade of litigation, a unanimous jury awarded $655 million to the victims, finding that officers of the PA perpetrated several of the attacks and that the PLO and PA provided support to terrorist organizations involved in the attacks. On appeal, however, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s verdict, reasoning that the PLO and PA are protected from U.S. court jurisdiction in the suit because the attacks “were not sufficiently connected to the United States” and were not “specifically targeted against United States citizens.”
On June 26, 2017, the Supreme Court requested the views of the United States before it determines whether to grant certiorari in the case. It has been over three months since the Court’s request, and it still remains unclear whether or when the administration will provide its views.
Other signatories include Senators John Cornyn (R-TX), Bill Nelson (D-FL), John Barrasso (R-WY), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Ed Markey (D-MA), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), John Boozman (R-AR), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), James Risch (R-ID), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), James Inhofe (R-OK), Bob Casey (D-PA), Dean Heller (R-NV), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Susan Collins (R-ME) and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL).
The full text of the senators’ letter is below:
Dear Attorney General Sessions and Secretary Tillerson:
On June 26, 2017, the Supreme Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in Sokolow v. PLO, No. 16-1071, a case concerning the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1992 (“ATA”) that is currently on petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. We write to strongly urge the Administration to avoid any unnecessary delay and respond as soon as possible to the Court’s request for views in this important matter.
Passed largely in response to the Palestine Liberation Organization’s 1985 murder of U.S. citizen Leon Klinghoffer aboard an Italian cruise ship, the ATA provides that perpetrators or supporters of international terrorism may be brought to justice in U.S. courts for injuring U.S. citizens regardless of where the injuries occurred. To accomplish this, the ATA provides for extraterritorial jurisdiction over terrorist acts abroad against Americans. As you know, both the State Department and Justice Department supported the enactment of the ATA.
In Sokolow, the ATA worked just as Congress intended: American victims secured a unanimous verdict against the PLO and Palestinian Authority (“PA”), whom the jury found liable for perpetrating and materially supporting acts of international terrorism abroad against U.S. citizens. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, however, vacated the jury’s decision, holding that the PLO and PA were protected from U.S. courts’ exercise of jurisdiction because the terror attacks “were not sufficiently connected to the United States.”
Ironically, the Second Circuit’s decision throwing out the verdict for lack of jurisdiction is precisely the result that the ATA was enacted to avoid. If left to stand, the decision casts severe doubt on the continued ability of other American victims of international terrorist attacks to obtain some semblance of justice in our nation’s courts against the perpetrators, and undermines a key counterterrorism tool that was deliberately crafted by Congress with the support and assistance of your Departments.
The Sokolow plaintiffs have since filed a petition for certiorari, and amicus briefs were promptly filed in support thereof by the House of Representatives and a bipartisan group of twenty-three United States senators. It has now been over three months, however, since the Court requested the views of the United States, with little indication at this time that such views will soon be provided to the Court.
The case is now in its fourteenth year. One of the plaintiffs—the father of a boy killed in a bombing at the Frank Sinatra International Student Center in Jerusalem—has already died without seeing the case finalized. Justice for American victims of international terrorism should not be delayed any longer.
Accordingly, we urge the Administration to demonstrate its resolve to combat international terrorism and put American victims first by avoiding any unnecessary delay and responding as soon as possible to the Supreme Court’s request for the views of the United States in this matter.
Sincerely,
###
LATEST OPEN LETTERS
-
05-06A Call to Action: Uniting for a Lasting Peace in the Holy Land
-
28-05Concerned world citizen
-
13-02World Peace
-
05-12My scream to the world
-
16-11To Syria and Bashar al-Assad
-
16-11To Palestine
-
24-10Japan should withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN), WHO's controlling parent body, to protect the basic human rights and lives of its citizens.
-
09-08Open Letter to António Guterres: Will the UN Protect Our Rights and End Our Suffering?
-
09-06Urgent Appeal
-
07-05Protect Our Great Earth And Nation!
VIRTUAL POST OFFICE
PETITIONS
LINKS
DONATION
Latest Blog Articles
-
19-12Our Friday News Analysis | What the World Reads Now!
-
18-12Our Wednesday News Analysis | Death feels imminent for 96% of children in Gaza, study finds
-
17-12Death feels imminent for 96% of children in Gaza, study finds
-
17-12Opinion | Israelis Feel the War Is Over. For Gazans It's a Different Story
-
17-12Genocide Israel is living in the past
-
16-12The Evangelical Pope | The Gospel of Life is for All Humanity
-
12-12Our Friday News Analysis | What the World Reads Now!
-
11-12Our Wednesday News Analysis | Biden and Starmer are destroying international law to protect Israel’s genocide
-
10-12Biden and Starmer are destroying international law to protect Israel’s genocide
-
10-12The West Bank villages wiped off the map by Israeli settler violence
-
10-12Palestine Letter: Reporting genocide, and why words do matter
Latest Comments
-
One of the most important and illuminating articles that I …
Comment by Benjamin Inbaraj -
And what's wrong here?
After all, there is the homeland …
Comment by Isac Boian -
Does this reinforce or deny my argument that Israel is …
Comment by Edward Campbell -
Many 'say' they support the Palestinian cause but do little …
Comment by Philip McFedries -
The UN is strangled by the "war for profit" cabal …
Comment by Philip McFedries -
I can't read the printing on the map.
Comment by Philip McFedries -
Good news!
Comment by Philip McFedries
COMMENTS
This article has 0 comments at this time. We invoke you to participate the discussion and leave your comment below. Share your opinion and let the world know.