The Great Debate
Jimmy Carter: President Obama can still advance Israeli/Palestinian peace
Jimmy Carter 3:28 p.m. EDT March 17 2016
Even this late in his presidency, creating a clear outline for moving forward is crucial
Since the time of President Harry Truman, the United States has assisted Israel, including persistent efforts to forge peace agreements with her neighbors. Our government has also vetoed more than 30 U.N. Security Council resolutions that were critical of Israel, including many that were supported unanimously by all other Security Council members, and for several decades our support has included massive economic and military aid, amounting to about $8 million per day. This financial commitment is now being renewed, unless Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decides to wait and conclude the deal with the next president.
At the same time, the U.S. has joined Europe, the United Nations, the Arab League and almost all other nations in espousing basic principles relating to peace and justice in the region, including a two-state solution and opposition to Israel’s policy of occupying Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The future prospect for this preferred solution can be greatly enhanced if President Obama spells out its advantages before leaving office.
During peace talks at Camp David in 1978, much of our discussion was focused on Israel’s support of U.N. Resolution 242, adopted unanimously by the Security Council in November 1967 in the aftermath of the Six-Day War. The key phrase was reaffirmed by Prime Minister Menachem Begin in the final agreement: “The inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every state in the area can live in security.” In his 1990 memoir, former secretary of State Dean Rusk explained the U.S. interpretation: “We never contemplated any significant grant of territory to Israel as a result of the June 1967 war.” This has been the general policy of our country’s government and the world community since that time.
In June 2009, President Obama stated, "Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's. The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop."
In May 2011, President Obama expressed the official U.S. position on peace parameters: "The United States believes that negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine. We believe the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states."
LATEST OPEN LETTERS
-
21-07Freedom
-
20-03Stand up to Trump
-
18-02Average Americans Response
-
23-12Tens of thousands of dead children.......this must stop
-
05-06A Call to Action: Uniting for a Lasting Peace in the Holy Land
-
28-05Concerned world citizen
-
13-02World Peace
-
05-12My scream to the world
-
16-11To Syria and Bashar al-Assad
-
16-11To Palestine
VIRTUAL POST OFFICE
PETITIONS
LINKS
DONATION
Latest Blog Articles
-
20-11Our Friday News Analysis | What the World Reads Now!
-
19-11Our Wednesday News Analysis | How Zionism and Its Traditional Relationship to Antisemitism is Playing Out Today
-
18-11How Zionism and Its Traditional Relationship to Antisemitism is Playing Out Today
-
18-11Islam vs the West: The four biggest fallacies about Islam explained
-
18-11Israel can’t fly us all out to South Africa
-
17-11The Evangelical Pope | Rooted in Faith, Hope, and Charity
-
13-11Our Friday News Analysis | What the World Reads Now!
-
12-11Our Wednesday News Analysis | After Gaza: Four Roads, One Destination
-
11-11After Gaza: Four Roads, One Destination
-
11-11Analysis Peace and War: Trump's Gaza Plan Will Either Move Ahead Soon – or Die
-
11-11‘I’m happy and sad to see you’: The paradox of surviving the Gaza genocide
Latest Comments
One of the most important and illuminating articles that I …
Comment by Benjamin Inbaraj
And what's wrong here?
After all, there is the homeland …
Comment by Isac Boian
Does this reinforce or deny my argument that Israel is …
Comment by Edward Campbell
Many 'say' they support the Palestinian cause but do little …
Comment by Philip McFedries
The UN is strangled by the "war for profit" cabal …
Comment by Philip McFedries
I can't read the printing on the map.
Comment by Philip McFedries
Good news!
Comment by Philip McFedries
COMMENTS
This article has 0 comments at this time. We invoke you to participate the discussion and leave your comment below. Share your opinion and let the world know.