Opinion // Mideast Master Plan: How Israeli-Palestinian Peace Fits Trump's Economic Interests
By Tzvia Greenfield
Published Nov 27, 2017
Fostering an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians is just one step in Trump's ultimate deal for Middle East profitability, so don't underestimate him
President Donald Trump shakes hands with Saudi Deputy Crown Prince and Defense Minister Mohammed bin Salman during a bilateral meeting, Saturday, May 20, 2017, in Riyadh Photo/Evan Vucci
About a week ago Russian President Vladimir Putin summoned Syrian President Bashar Assad, and after him the presidents of Iran and Turkey, to the city of Sochi to inform them of what were to be the governing arrangements in Syria. The widely accepted conclusion is that U.S. President Donald Trump is continuing the policy of his predecessor and abandoning the Middle East (and Israel’s interests) to Putin’s arbitrary actions. But recent events raise another possibility: that there is an international political turning point underway, the most interesting since the days of the Cold War.
Trump and Putin are acting like they’re dividing up areas of control. Not along ideological lines, but based on pure economic interests. Trump, as we know, defines himself first and foremost as a businessman. Back in his debates with Hillary Clinton, he said he would seek good relations with Putin, and no one took him seriously. Everyone assumed Trump was alluding to Russian involvement in his favor in the elections. But it seems he meant a little more than that.
If Russia can profit from huge investments in Syria during its reconstruction, the United States can profit from huge investments in Saudi Arabia, which intends to rebuild itself under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. But the deal as a whole requires change in the Middle East. And so Trump suddenly stated that he would advance a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. His second step was in Saudi Arabia. After a visit in which he heaped honor on King Salman, it turned out that his son Mohammed had been appointed de facto ruler.
When the new ruler decided to build a modern Saudi Arabia and embark on a struggle against the subversive actions of Iran and its affiliates in the region, Trump threatened at the same time to cancel the nuclear agreement with Iran. The next phase in the plan apparently involved ousting Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri, and bin Salman’s declaration that Lebanon will not be allowed to cooperate with Hezbollah. This makes Trump the man at the right time and right place.
It seems that the next steps in the plan will require Israel’s involvement. Although Russia apparently pledged to stop Iran to some extent (and perhaps also North Korea), which would be the reason the meeting in Sochi was called, Saudi Arabia isn’t relying on this and prefers an alliance with Israel, which, like Saudi Arabia, is directly threatened. Thus it was suddenly discovered that the Israel Defense Forces chief of staff was interviewed on a Saudi website, announcing that Israel was prepared to cooperate with the moderate Arab countries. And thus also emerged the reason an agreement with the Palestinians became such an urgent issue on Trump’s agenda: Saudi Arabia apparently can’t create an alliance with Israel without a reasonable solution to the Palestinian problem. And since Israel refuses to give all the Palestinians full rights within it, the only solution that remains is some version of a two-state solution.
That seems to be what’s going to happen. Israel and the Palestinian Authority can be furious over it, but neither of them has or will have a choice. Saudi Arabia (and after it, Iraq) is evidently too important a business opportunity for Trump and the American economy to allow Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Education Minister Naftali Bennett or Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to disrupt the plan, and Russia will cooperate if its interests are met. The pressure, in the north as well, will obviously continue until Israel gets the hint. Those who don’t believe that Trump can plan long-term moves like this are missing out on history in the making.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
SHARE YOUR OPINION, POST A COMMENT
Fill in the field below to share your opinion and post your comment.
LATEST OPEN LETTERS
- 05-06To International Community and Leaders around the world
- 03-07Letter of Apology
- 20-05Sace palestine
- 20-05Free Palestine
- 17-05A suggestion for some economics problems
- 15-05Free Palestine
- 04-04A moment of the sound of silence, a prayer for Russia
- 03-04The Gilbratar burn out and how it can be solved peacefully
- 03-04Biafra Freedom from Nigeria
- 24-03Open letter to António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations
VIRTUAL POST OFFICE
Latest Blog Articles
- 20-09'Let us fight together for human rights, for a country that is democratic for all its citizens'
- 18-09From Peace to Armageddon / The Israel-Palestine nightmare
- 18-09Opinion Are the Bedouin of Palestine a Lost Tribe of Israel?
- 15-09EQUALITY, EQUALITY, EQUALITY – Feared in the Land of ‘Zionism’ …
- 13-09A 'gentleman's agreement': How Oslo worked out as planned for Israel
- 12-09Two-state hypocrisy
- 10-09Year 5779 … Can Oil and Vinegar Become One?
- 07-09Analysis // Trump's Revived Jordan-Palestinian Confederation Plan May Be Dead on Arrival
- 07-09These millennials still believe in a two-state solution. Are they too late?
- 06-09Trump’s Middle East Peace Plan Makes Palestinians Disappear
- 04-09To Dignify or To Destroy