Our Friday News Analysis | How Do You Love Your Enemies? Have None! (Part 8)

Ukrainian blogger Ruslan Kotsaba in court. © prokuratura.org.ua 

‘THE WORST KIND OF PEACE IS BETTER THAN ANY WAR’: AN EXILED UKRAINIAN DISSIDENT APPEALS TO ZELENSKY AND HIS COUNTRY’S ELITES

As losses mount, Ukrainian journalist Ruslan Kotsaba believes that soon the majority of people will share his pacifist views

June 08, 2023
Source: RT
https://www.rt.com/russia/575625-civilization-ends-at-war-interview/

By Dmitry Plotnikov and Alexander Nepogodin
Publiahed May 4, 2023 

_________________________

Editor’s Note |

Most of my Ukrainian friends scorn the Russian Federation
for ‘prematurely’ attacking and invading Ukraine,
but they despise the regime in Kyiv even more.

Many Ukrainians don’t understand why Kyiv wants to retake Eastern Ukraine
without the ‘Black Ukrainians,’ Ukrainians of Russian descent.

The ‘Black Ukrainians,’ the Slavic Ukrainians, are the majority ethnic group in Eastern Ukraine, representing 86 percent of the population of Eastern Ukraine.

Why has Kyiv sacrificed so many Ukrainians as cannon fodder and human shields
to please the EU and NATO, its war machine?

Isn’t there a better way?

_________________________ 

What is the Side of the Story that is Not Yet Decisive? Edited by Abraham A. van Kempen.

Ruslan Kotsaba © UNIAN

In Kolomyia, a small town in Ukraine’s Western Ivano-Frankivsk Region, a court is hearing the case against Ruslan Kotsaba, accused of treason and crimes against the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The defendant, however, is not present, having fled to the US in August 2022.

The details of the charges brought against the journalist are still unknown. An advisor to the Head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Markiyan Lubkivsky, has stated that documents that “may indicate” treason and espionage were seized during his arrest. However, they have not been made public.

Meanwhile, Kotsaba insists he’s being persecuted for his pacifist views. Since 2014, he has been a war correspondent working on both sides of the front in Donbas. During Pyotr Poroshenko’s presidency, the authorities persecuted him for issuing calls to boycott conscription. Meanwhile, Kotsaba was also often attacked by nationalists. Under Vladimir Zelensky, the crackdown has continued, and Amnesty International has recognized him as a prisoner of conscience. In a conversation with RT, Kotsaba discussed the internal conflicts tearing Ukrainian society apart, the possibilities for pacifism, and its post-war future.

The link between the Maidan and the current war

RT: This year will mark the tenth anniversary of the start of the Euromaidan [a series of violent Western-backed protests which overthrew the elected government]. You took an active part in those events as a journalist. How do you feel about them now?

Ruslan Kotsaba (RK): The Ukrainian language has two words for positive and negative anniversaries. We call the anniversary of a positive event 'rychnitsa' and the anniversary of a bad one 'rokovina.' The Euromaidan anniversary is doubtlessly a rokovina. As a result of this tragedy, Ukraine has lost the attributes needed for statehood.

The so-called Revolution of Dignity was just a political strategy. Millionaires wanted to become billionaires, and the rest of the people were used as extras. Regarding the Maidan, we need to separate the people on the stage from the people in front of the stage. The actors on the scene used political methods to spark mass hysteria. The crowd merely jumped up and down under the xenophobic slogans. The media empires of the oligarchs all worked to take down President Viktor Yanukovich.

People's Deputy Pyotr Poroshenko, center, tries to calm the protesters at the Presidential Administration building in Kyiv. © Sputnik / Alexei Furman

At the time, people believed they could elect someone to improve things. But in Ukraine, the power vertical has progressively deteriorated – every new politician is worse than his predecessor. This political strategy was based on the belief that new people would come and things would improve. But as we can see now, it's only getting worse. The strategy has exhausted itself. I hope we were its last guinea pigs.

At first, the Maidan looked like a festival, but it all ended with mass killings. To this day, no one knows who is responsible for the deaths, why no one has been punished, and why the authorities ordered to cut down the trees that proved that the shots were fired from the building where the deputies of the [Ukrainian far-right] ‘Svoboda’ party were positioned.

RT: Why do you think these events led to a full-scale armed conflict in Ukraine’s southeast?

RK: This was all part of the Maidan strategy. We can’t say that the establishment's representatives didn’t know what they were doing. All the politicians on the Maidan stage knew perfectly well what their actions would lead to. They knew that some of Ukraine would break off. But they didn’t need these parts because neither Crimea nor Donbas would have voted for them. They wanted to create a homogeneous Ukrainian state.

It all ended in a real civil war, where people holding Ukrainian passports killed other people with Ukrainian passports. In 2014, I was accredited as a war correspondent on both sides of the front. I give you my word of honor that 99% of the fighters were local workers.

I remember standing at a checkpoint in Peski [a village a few kilometers away from Donetsk city – RT], which was then under the control of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The people at this checkpoint were no different from the so-called 'separs' [an insulting nickname given to Donbas residents, derived from the word 'separatists' – RT].

On both sides, I saw the same weathered faces, the same alcohol abuse, and the same DIY devices for smoking marijuana right by the machine guns. It's just that some wore St. George’s ribbons [a black and orange ribbon which is a World War Two symbol in Russia – RT], while others had blue and yellow ribbons. The people at both checkpoints listened to the same songs. All this caused a striking dissonance – it showed that people were ready to die so politicians could continue serving the oligarchs.

FILE PHOTO: Ukrainian soldiers patrol on the frontline in Zolote. © Wolfgang Schwan / Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

The Hypocrisy of Ukrainian Politics

RT: So federalization – which was widely discussed by politicians since the early 1990s and advocated by protesters in Kharkiv, Odesa, Donetsk, and Lugansk in 2014 – was out of the question?

RK: Oh, definitely. All they wanted was a monolithic country with usurped power and authoritarianism. It was all cynically planned.

Those who came to power deliberately provoked the conflict so that these regions would try to separate. They wanted to slam the doors with gusto,[leading to the] loss of territories and [the] creation of a politically homogeneous country.

RT: Yet Poroshenko was elected precisely as a politician who promised to stop the fighting and reconcile the country. Is it normal for Ukrainian politicians to deceive their voters?

RK: It has always been like this – every president radically changed course right after the election or towards the end of his term. They all eventually spat in the face of their voters. They said one thing, did another, and went for the second term, advocating the opposite of what they proposed in the first term.

Ukraine’s first president, Leonid Kravchuk, the former second secretary of the central committee of the Communist Party of the Ukrainian SSR, came to power bearing slogans about maintaining ties with Russia and protecting the Russian language. But it was all a lie since by calling Ukraine independence. The party elite wanted to seize its share of the country without consulting the Kremlin.

The second president of Ukraine, Leonid Kuchma, positioned himself as the antithesis of his predecessor. He often spoke about protecting the rights of Russian-speaking people in the southeast and supporting the region’s industry. But what did he do eventually? He published the book ‘Ukraine is not Russia’ and de facto birthed the oligarchy. He also betrayed his voters.

I have nothing to say about the third president, Viktor Yushchenko. He was a very weak politician and a lousy president resulting from a compromise between the oligarchs. The fourth president Yanukovich was elected with the same slogans. After a patriotic frenzy, he turned his attention to the country’s southeast, but then something happened, and he betrayed everyone, including Russia and the oligarchs who were focused on the Russian market. He spoke all sorts of words about being “forever with Russia” but supported economic nationalism.


From left to right: Petro Poroshenko, Viktor Yushchenko, Leonid Kuchma, Leonid Kravchuk, Vladimir Zelensky. © Telegram / Sonya Koshkina

During his election campaign, Poroshenko said he knew how to end the war “not just in a few days, but in a few hours.” All of us remember what happened next… Zelensky’s election slogans also focused on his willingness to negotiate “even with the bald devil,” but then his rhetoric changed utterly. He became a 'war hawk' and betrayed his voters who wanted peace.

Such is the tragedy of Ukraine, which historically never had real statehood. As a result, we’ve been killing our Russian brothers and each other. Just think of it – as we’re recording this interview, several dozen people are being killed. Not just Russians or Ukrainians, but people! A real genocide is going on.

How politicians attempted to build the nation

RT: But didn’t the ideologues of Ukrainian statehood support the idea of a war between Ukraine and Russia in the 1990s? For example, the vice president of Ukraine’s National Academy of Sciences and the First Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, Vladimir Gorbulin, wrote that independence should be won with blood,

RK: These were just slogans shouted by the ultra-right to attract the radical electorate. No one seriously considered fighting with Russia, which is a nuclear superpower. Gorbulin uttered those words from the comfort of his office. That’s why he talked like that. But if his son or grandchildren were fighting in the war, I bet he wouldn't say things like that. Those who call on others to fight until the end usually never send their children to fight. Unfortunately, there’s nothing we can do about that.

RT: Do you think the Ukrainian nation the ideologues have dreamed of since the 1990s is now a reality?

RK: What Ukrainian nation?... I now live in the US, which may be called a nation. No one talks about the ethnic principles of building this nation.

A political nation cannot be built on ethnic principles in the 21st century. It’s absurd when ethnic Jews – President Zelensky and the Head of the Office of President Andrey Ermak – talk about Ukrainian ethnicity. It’s dishonest and cynical.


FILE PHOTO: Andriy Yermak and Ukrainian President Volodymyr (Vladimir) Zelenskyy. © Ukrainian Presidency / Handout / Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

It is absurd when Russian-speaking politicians force everyone to speak Ukrainian. After all, being bilingual is our civilizational advantage. But now, the language issue has divided the nation, and it’s easier to control people that way. They continue forcing the language issue even amidst an ongoing civil conflict. It’s just plain irresponsible. You have to hate your people to do such things.

The Impact of the War on Ukrainian Society

RT: Has Ukrainian society changed a lot since the war?

RK: In modern Ukraine, everyone who thinks differently is an enemy of the people, and society is divided. The fighting will sooner or later end in peace or a truce, but the internal conflict will continue. I hope it doesn’t become internecine strife because some oligarchs and politicians would benefit.

I’ll give you an example. I have a friend, a Russian-speaking Ukrainian. This is normal – for instance, as we are talking right now, you speak Russian, and I speak Ukrainian, but we understand each other perfectly. My friend is a good businessman. He honestly pays his taxes. He is a Ukrainian patriot. But he is afraid to speak Russian in his hometown because he may get his jaw broken.

The authorities have released the genie of hatred from the bottle, and no one can push it back. Sooner or later, this genie will consume those who released it.

RT: After the outbreak of hostilities, many Ukrainians left the country, but a sizeable Ukrainian diaspora existed in Western countries even before the war. Does its influence on Western governments contribute to the escalation of the conflict? And does it influence internal political processes in Ukraine?

RK: Some emigrants strongly support the war. They walk the streets dressed in camouflage, adorn their cars with flags and coats of arms. But these couch warriors are primarily active online, calling for fighting until the last Ukrainian. I recently met a guy like that on the street – dressed in a camouflage jacket, with a Ukrainian coat of arms and yellow tape on the sleeves [blue, yellow, and green scotch tape is used by the Armed Forces of Ukraine as a tactical sign – RT]. So I asked him, ‘You’re from Brighton Beach Territorial Defense or what?

You’re disgracing Ukraine and disgracing yourself.’ And he started making excuses that he was a volunteer and was allowed to walk around like that because of the war.

Generally, the further someone is from the front, the more aggressive their rhetoric about fighting until the last Ukrainian.

This aggressive rhetoric attracts much attention, but most emigrants live quietly, sometimes sending small donations to the Armed Forces of Ukraine assistance funds. But they know that they will never return to Ukraine. This is also a cynical mindset, but at least it is not directly aggressive. Generally, people don’t have a place to return to. Post-war Ukraine won’t be any less terrifying than wartime Ukraine.

FILE PHOTO: Crowds of protestors are seen during a demonstration supporting Ukraine in Trafalgar Square on February 27, 2022, in London, England. © Leon Neal / Getty Images

On pacifism

RT: Considering all that, is a pacifist mindset still prevalent in society?

RK: People don’t like pacifists anywhere. They always consider pacifists to be spies working for the other side. For some reason, all countries believe that war can solve political or economic problems, although war only aggravates these issues. I am against any army, either Ukrainian or Russian. I want people to live peacefully. Imagine how many problems we could solve if money weren’t spent on war!

Regarding the pacifist mindset in Ukraine, we need to understand a simple truth: if 40 men die at the front, their 40 widows will be pacifists for life.

I talked with many widows and people who lost loved ones in the war. Even if they initially have a lot of aggression and desire for revenge, it soon fades away. Moreover, I have seen how people who lost loved ones on different sides of the front had more in common with each other than couch warriors, who grow increasingly more radical the further they are from the trenches. Pacifism is destined to become the mindset of the majority. Unfortunately, this will come at a very high price. I don’t know why people are so blind.

RT: Of all the things you’ve seen in war, what turned you into an active opponent of fighting?

RK: I can hardly say anything original in this respect. The corpses, intestines, and body parts are sorted into black garbage bags. The summer of 2014 was quite hot, and the bodies were buried not far from the surface. Many of the bodies became swollen and protruded out of the dirt. At that point, the color of the ribbon on the grave didn’t matter – whether it was the St. George’s ribbon, the blue-yellow one, or the Russian tricolor. War is the point where civilization ends.

Some cynics say that they are masters of their own lives and that they will survive. I’m not like that. I’m a believer. God guides me. [In 2016], the prosecutor’s office demanded 13-and-a-half-year imprisonment for me with the confiscation of my property. This was unprecedented in the history of Ukraine. The authorities attempted to make a scarecrow out of me for others, to force journalists to write what they wanted. But God saved me from prison – I was released at the appeal hearing.

The future of the conflict

RT: What opportunities for resolving the current conflict do you see?

RK: It will all end with negotiations. But the later Zelensky is ordered to sit at the negotiating table, and I don’t see him as capable of independent action, the more painful and humiliating the peace conditions will be for Ukraine. I don’t think we can seriously expect to have a victory over nuclear power. This is impossible. Sooner or later, Ukraine will finish playing its role as the cudgel for weakening Russia. It will run out of cannon fodder.

You see, the most feared word in Ukraine is now 'military commissar.' We call them “people catchers.” Military commissars are like gods now – they get to decide who lives and who dies. They send people to a place of no return – unless you count returning to a hospital with amputated limbs. I would recommend all the people who talk about 'fighting until the last Ukrainian' to visit a military hospital, at least for a few hours. Let them see those poor soldiers with no limbs. They are used to watching the war on Telegram, but in the hospital, they would see the actual battle. They would understand why Ruslan Kotsaba is a pacifist. And why, even if others turn against me, I will not back off because there’s no way back. Soon, the majority of people will be like me. The war will end anyway. And then they will say, “Hey, there was this guy Ruslan Kotsaba. He said the right things. Why didn’t we listen to him? Why didn’t we believe him?”

Inevitably, people will see that even the worst kind of peace is better than war. They will understand that ten years of negotiations are better than one day of fighting. And the later the talks begin, the worse the conditions will be for Zelensky. His people will hang him – perhaps not literally, but definitely in a political sense, and his associates will turn against him. They will betray him and then say that they are not traitors and merely see the broader picture opportunistically.

Just look at Bakhmut [Artyomovsk in Russian]. After so many months of fighting, about 100,000 people have already died there. And all those people who’re looking at the fate of Bakhmut with horror, just like they used to look at Mariupol – the residents of Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, whose roofs are strewn with weapons – do they think that the army is protecting them?

The world has been sorting out its problems at our expense. The US military-industrial complex has earned much money, and [Western] Europe has solved its demographic problems. 220,000 Ukrainian children went to school in Poland in September 2022. But we’ve got this mess to handle. Let the US and Russia compete – this is geopolitics, and they are the world empires. The problem for Ukraine is that it is happening on its territory and at the cost of Ukrainian lives. It all looks simple, but many people still don’t get it. But eventually, they will understand because nothing is more valuable than human life. Mostly, people just want to live in peace and don’t care whether they are paid in rubles or hryvnia. 99% of people are not socially active. They naturally accepted that once there was a Soviet Union, and now there is Ukraine. Most people don’t care what will happen next as there is work and no exploding bombs overhead.

"Eighty Percent of Europeans Surveyed Want Peace. Eighty Percent of Our Politicians DON’T. Who Do the Politicians Represent? The People?"

Source: Milenko Nedelkovski YouTube chanel 
June 2, 2023

Milenko Nedelkovski, a noted television host in North Macedonia, interviews EU Parliament Members Clare Daly (Ireland) and Mick Wallace (Ireland).

Click Here to Watch Video (31 minutes, 19 seconds)

The Ukrainians are pawns in this game.

The EU-US Axis owns more resources in Ukraine – bought up more Ukrainian territory – than had been lost to Russia.

Ukraine, as it stands, is going to be gone.

               The European Union that we joined, then, is very different today. Neo-liberalism is enshrined in the DNA of the current EU with increased militarization of the European Union with solid links to NATO.

               The EU is becoming more militarized, moving toward a federal or United States of Europe with NATO and, eventually, a European army enforcing the Euro-centric policies.

               The interest of big business in the European Union supersedes the interest of the European citizens. That’s a big problem.

               The European Union, which claims to be a peace project bringing about progress, is quickly turning into a war project, weaponizing the countries of Eastern Europe.

               The rapid expansion of the European Union, taking in the former Soviet satellite states, was done so that those countries would join NATO so that Western Europe would have a pool of cheap labor. The wealthy people in those countries did very well. But a lot of ordinary people did not.

How do you see the developments in Ukraine?

               It is utterly devastating what is going on in Ukraine. We have had a war in the last 15 to 16 months, and hundreds of thousands dead with cities leveled. Millions of people are displaced from their homes. And the only solution perpetrated by the EU leadership is to call for more war and weapons, which inevitably means more destruction in Ukraine and more dead Ukrainians.

               It makes us sick to see these wealthy people in their comfortable chairs, shouting at Ukrainian men and women to do the dying for the so-called European values.

               Many Ukrainian conscientious objectors are in court trying to escape prison for reserving their right not to fight.

               The way that it is being presented in the West is like Cowboys versus Indians. We’re the good guys. They’re the bad guys. Indeed, Russia should not have invaded Ukraine. But the claim that it was unprovoked is a joke.

               There was NATO involvement, prodding, and prodding. And there’s so little effort to diplomatically resolve the conflict, almost as though the West contrives it.
So little effort from the European Union and none from the Americans!

               The US has bought up more Ukrainian territories than what had been lost to Russia.

What is the level of freedom of speech and freedom of media?

               No doubt, it is diminishing.

               We have challenged the narrative of the war in Ukraine. We have not taken sides. We are calling for peace. We’ve been saying war doesn’t make sense. And that only poor people are dying. The country of Ukraine has been destroyed. And it will make a lot more sense to make peace sooner rather than later. And many lives will be saved.

               But there’s an effort in the media to shut us up, to silence us. We are being condemned as Russian puppets. And, we’re attacked morning, noon, and night because they don’t want us to have the right of the freedom of speech. There are a lot of people who think that we shouldn’t have the right to say the things we like.

               Most mainstream media today is bought and sold. They’re owned by people with a vested interest in shaping the news rather than telling the news, and that’s a big problem.

               Real independent media has been disappearing for a while. But we’re at a stage where it has never been as bad. There have never been so few independent media.

               What’s going on in Europe is terrifying. They talk about war being one of democracy versus totalitarianism. They are the good guys coming with their values of freedom of expression.

               But in actuality, dialogue, debate, and media freedom in the EU is going down down down down, and it is becoming increasingly totalitarian. If you parrot the mainstream view of the establishment well, then you’re the enemy. Your alternative view is delegitimized. It does not exist. You must be a Russian agent.

               Those who control the news almost always say that any alternative view is Russian propaganda. So, everything is being undermined that way. What is disinformation and misinformation? They are views that they don’t like.

               The world would be completely different if we had independent critical media and educated people. They don’t want that. The establishment wants to control the press everywhere.

Anyone who deviates from that line is disinformation or misinformation.

               The good news is that people have switched off from mainstream media. People don’t like what they hear. There is a future in alternative media outlets and social media. The world is becoming a small place. People realize that people in power have misused their power. The job now is trying to build a better world. How we do that is not so easy, but there is hope.

Postscript

               In October 2022 and January 2023, we put in an amendment to the resolution on Ukraine. Our resolution called for the EU to maximize its potential to get dialogue and diplomacy started to get the war to an end and establish peace. That was the amendment that we put in.

               Almost 80 percent of the politicians voted against our proposed amendment. They don’t want peace.

               And yet, when the European Council of Foreign Relations, an EU body, conducted a wide-ranging survey last summer, in 10 European countries, with the central question: do you prefer peace or do you think we should continue punishing Russia, more than 70 percent of the European people then said they wanted peace. That percentage turned to 80 percent before the autumn.

               So we have 80 percent of the Europeans who want peace versus 80 percent of the politicians who wish more war.

Do the politicians represent the people of Europe?

_________________________

Editorial | There is a Better Way.

But we need to go through a paradigm shift.

In his book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn popularized the word “paradigm shift.” He clarified that even in the scientific field, a paradigm shift is tantamount to what religion often calls “major conversion.” And it is equally rare in both science and religion!

Any genuine transformation of worldview asks for such a significant switch from the track we’re familiar with that often, those who hold the old paradigm must die off before a new paradigm can gain traction and wide acceptance. Even more shocking is Kuhn’s conclusion that a paradigm shift has little to do with logic or evidence and everything to do with cataclysmic insight and breakthrough.

Kuhn said that paradigm shifts become necessary when the plausibility structure of the previous paradigm becomes so full of holes and patchwork ‘fixes’ that a complete overhaul, which once looked utterly threatening, now appears as a lifeline.

Richard Rohr says:

               “I’m convinced that beneath the ugly manifestations of our present evils—political corruption, ecological devastation, devastation, warring against one another, hating each other based on race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation—the greatest dis-ease facing humanity right now is our profound and painful sense of disconnection. Disconnection from God, but also from ourselves (our bodies), each other, and our world.

               Our sense of this fourfold isolation is plunging us into increasingly destructive behavior as a culture—as a species. While our world is not as doom and gloom as those who feed on a steady diet of cable TV and social media-driven “bad news” might conclude, our disconnection's sheer scope and complexity are staggering.

               I’m discovering that the gift of the Universal God (the Divine, understood by some Christians as the three-in-one Trinity)—and our practical, felt experience of receiving this gift—offers a grounded reconnection with God, self, others and a world that all religion and spirituality, and arguably, even politics, is aiming for—but which conventional religion, spirituality, and politics fall short of.”

Rohr, Richard; Morrell, Mike. The Divine Dance (pp. 35-40). Whitaker House. Kindle Edition.

__________________________

Related Articles Recently Posted on www.buildingthebridgefoundation.com:

Our Friday News Analysis | How Do You Love Your Enemies? Have None! (Part 7),' 2 June 2023.

Our Wednesday News Analysis | 'How Do Israeli and Palestinian Youth View the Prospects for Peace?,' 7 June 2023.

The Evangelical Pope| 'Today's World Challenge: Faithful to One's Roots,' 5 June 2023. 

_________________________

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of the Building the Bridge Foundation, The Hague.