The Great Debate
Jimmy Carter: President Obama can still advance Israeli/Palestinian peace
Jimmy Carter 3:28 p.m. EDT March 17 2016
Even this late in his presidency, creating a clear outline for moving forward is crucial
Since the time of President Harry Truman, the United States has assisted Israel, including persistent efforts to forge peace agreements with her neighbors. Our government has also vetoed more than 30 U.N. Security Council resolutions that were critical of Israel, including many that were supported unanimously by all other Security Council members, and for several decades our support has included massive economic and military aid, amounting to about $8 million per day. This financial commitment is now being renewed, unless Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decides to wait and conclude the deal with the next president.
At the same time, the U.S. has joined Europe, the United Nations, the Arab League and almost all other nations in espousing basic principles relating to peace and justice in the region, including a two-state solution and opposition to Israel’s policy of occupying Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The future prospect for this preferred solution can be greatly enhanced if President Obama spells out its advantages before leaving office.
During peace talks at Camp David in 1978, much of our discussion was focused on Israel’s support of U.N. Resolution 242, adopted unanimously by the Security Council in November 1967 in the aftermath of the Six-Day War. The key phrase was reaffirmed by Prime Minister Menachem Begin in the final agreement: “The inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every state in the area can live in security.” In his 1990 memoir, former secretary of State Dean Rusk explained the U.S. interpretation: “We never contemplated any significant grant of territory to Israel as a result of the June 1967 war.” This has been the general policy of our country’s government and the world community since that time.
In June 2009, President Obama stated, "Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's. The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop."
In May 2011, President Obama expressed the official U.S. position on peace parameters: "The United States believes that negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine. We believe the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states."
LATEST OPEN LETTERS
- 18-02Average Americans Response
- 23-12Tens of thousands of dead children.......this must stop
- 05-06A Call to Action: Uniting for a Lasting Peace in the Holy Land
- 28-05Concerned world citizen
- 13-02World Peace
- 05-12My scream to the world
- 16-11To Syria and Bashar al-Assad
- 16-11To Palestine
- 24-10Japan should withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN), WHO's controlling parent body, to protect the basic human rights and lives of its citizens.
- 09-08Open Letter to António Guterres: Will the UN Protect Our Rights and End Our Suffering?
Latest Blog Articles
- 20-02Our Friday News Analysis | What the World Reads Now!
- 19-02Our Wednesday News Analysis | Being Jewish after Gaza: Peter Beinart's 'reckoning' is a bid to rehabilitate Zionism
- 18-02Being Jewish after Gaza: Peter Beinart's 'reckoning' is a bid to rehabilitate Zionism
- 18-02‘No to ethnic cleansing’: over 350 rabbis sign US ad assailing Trump’s Gaza plan
- 18-02From Turtle Island to Palestine: On the Forced Transfer of Indigenous People from Their Land
- 17-02The Evangelical Pope | Europe’s Rich Christian Heritage
- 13-02Our Friday News Analysis | What the World Reads Now!
- 12-02Our Wednesday News Analysis | The strategic cost of Israel’s endless wars
- 11-02The strategic cost of Israel’s endless wars
- 11-02Hypothetical, but Plausible: How to End the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict for Good, Right Now
- 11-02Trump must not be allowed to torpedo the Palestinian right to remain