Common Grounds
Our Friday News Analysis | In Search of a Nation's Soul (Part 21)
Speech by Prime Minister Mark Rutte About the Role of the Netherlands in the History of Slavery
A Tribute to the Marginalized.
In Memory of Those Slain.
Can We Heal a Broken World?
Will Hope Transcend Powerlessness?
We Not Only Share the Past. We Share Our Future.
Watch the speech on YouTube with English subtitles
The Hague, 3 February 2023 | If you know of any story that is decisive, tell the world. We're still searching.
Editor’s Note | One Weekend a Year, Let’s Celebrate with Honor, Respect, and Dignity. Let’s Party and Reconcile and Have a Good Time.
Can we celebrate – acclaim, commend, hail – slavery?
Should we honor, respect, and dignify our former slaves?
Why don’t we commemorate their blood, sweat, and tears?
They have done so much for so many, for so long, for so little. They helped build the most powerful economy on earth, the EU-US economy, with a combined Gross Domestic Product equaling $40 trillion.
Let’s give them credit.
Let us honor their children and theirs.
Be proud of your ancestry! The world is indebted to You and your Forefathers. Thank you!
What is the Side of the Story that is Not Yet Decisive? By Abraham A. van Kempen featuring Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s Apology About the Role of the Netherlands in the History of Slavery.'
I am…Somebody — by Jesse Jackson, Chicago, Illinois USA
I am Somebody! I am Somebody!
I may be poor, But I am Somebody.
I may be young, But I am Somebody.
I may be on welfare, But I am Somebody.
I may be small, But I am Somebody.
I may have made mistakes, But I am Somebody.
My clothes are different,
My face is different,
My hair is different, But I am Somebody.
I am black, brown, or white.
I speak a different language
But I must be respected,
Protected,
Never rejected.
I am God’s child!
Transcript: Speech by Prime Minister Mark Rutte about the role of the Netherlands in the history of slavery
Speech | The National Archives, The Hague, 19 December 2022
In the following speech, Prime Minister Mark Rutte apologizes for the past actions of the Dutch State: to enslaved people in the past, everywhere in the world, who suffered as a consequence of those actions, as well as to their daughters and sons, and all their descendants, up to the present day.
The prime minister gave the apology at the National Archives in The Hague, in the presence of representatives of organizations that have pressed for acknowledgment of the effects of slavery.
Watch the speech on YouTube with English subtitles
Good afternoon, Ladies and Gentlemen,
And for anyone listening or watching in a different time zone:
Bun morgu,
Bon dia,
Good morning,
History speaks to us through millions of documents here in the National Archives.
And though we can’t hear the unwritten voices from the past, the story that emerges from all those documents is not always pretty.
Often it is ugly, painful, and even downright shameful.
That is certainly the case with the role of the Netherlands in the history of slavery.
We who live in today’s world must acknowledge the evils of slavery in the most transparent possible terms and condemn it as a crime against humanity.
As a criminal system that caused untold numbers of people untold suffering.
The suffering that continues in the lives of people today.
And we in the Netherlands must confront our part in that history.
It’s therefore opportune that we are gathered here today at the National Archives.
This is the home of our national memory.
So this is the place to examine our national conscience.
Here, you can’t get around the historical facts.
By 1814, more than 600,000 enslaved African women, men, and children had been shipped to the American continent, in deplorable conditions, by Dutch slave traders.
Most were taken to Suriname, but others were sent to Curaçao, St Eustatius, and other locations.
They were wrenched from their families and stripped of their humanity.
They were transported – and treated – like cattle.
Often under the governmental authority of the Dutch West India Company.
In Asia, between 660,000 and over one million people – we don’t even know exactly how many – were traded within the areas under the authority of the Dutch East India Company.
The numbers are unimaginable.
The human suffering behind them is even more unimaginable.
Countless stories have been passed down, and witness testimonies given, proving that there was no limit to the arbitrary cruelty of the slave system.
And thus no limit to the injustice and the sheer terror.
We need only open Anton de Kom’s book, ‘We Slaves of Suriname,’ to read about the most horrific treatment and punishment.
We read of people being flogged and tortured to death.
Of people whose limbs were hacked off or whose faces were branded with hot irons.
Each person’s fate was more gruesome than the last.
Injustice upon injustice with every turn of the page.
And just as Anton de Kom described the horrors of Suriname, other horrors unfolded elsewhere under the same Dutch governmental authority.
We can read about it.
We can know about it.
And still, the awful fate of enslaved people is barely conceivable.
So let us consider the hard facts contained in the archives.
Take, for example, the enormous administrative system set up around the time slavery was abolished in 1863.
We can still study those records here today.
Page after page lists the names – and a few other personal details – of enslaved people, registered by plantation and owner.
The records are cut-and-dry, concise, businesslike, and systematic, making them all the more shocking.
Because they underline the absurdity of a system in which one human being makes a being commodity of another.
A system so inhuman and unjust that in 1863 it was not the enslaved people who received financial compensation from the State but the enslavers.
And yet it could be even more cruel, even more unfair because everyone who nominally gained their freedom in Suriname in 1863 was forced to keep working under the supervision of the State for another ten years.
For many, this meant another ten years of living an unfree life of subjugation.
Until 1873.
Which is 150 years ago next year.
That history concerns us all.
A complex history in which different years and events carry significance in other places.
Not just in 1863 and 1873.
But 1860, too, was the year in which slavery in the Dutch East Indies was formally abolished.
1814, when the Netherlands abolished its transatlantic slave trade.
1848, the de facto end of slavery in St Maarten.
Or 1795, when Tula led a revolt in Curaçao that is still commemorated yearly.
So many moments, so many stories, and so much history.
In recent years, that history has gained more attention – in exhibitions, publications, and public debate.
Social awareness is growing.
And that is leading to a change in the way we think.
This is good, appropriate, and necessary, for the silence has gone on too long.
I have experienced that change in thinking – I want to be open about that.
For a long time, I thought we could not easily take meaningful responsibility for something that happened so long ago.
Something that none of us experienced firsthand.
For a long time, I thought that the Netherlands’ role in slavery was a thing of the past, something we had put behind us.
But I was wrong.
Centuries of oppression and exploitation still have an effect to this very day.
In racist stereotypes.
In discriminatory patterns of exclusion.
In social inequality.
And to break those patterns, we also have to face up to the past openly and honestly.
A past that we share with other countries and that has forged a special connection between our societies for all time.
It is true that no one alive now is personally to blame for slavery.
But it is also true that the Dutch State bears responsibility for the terrible suffering inflicted on enslaved people and their descendants in all its manifestations throughout history.
So, we cannot ignore the effects of the past on the present.
The report entitled ‘Chains of the Past by the Slavery History Dialogue Group’ plays a vital role in the growing awareness many of us are experiencing.
The report was published on 1 July 2021, containing several hard-hitting conclusions and clear recommendations.
The three keywords are acknowledgment, apology, and recovery.
Today we are sending the official government response to this report to the Dutch House of Representatives.
In that response, we embrace the analysis and conclusions of the Dialogue Group.
In the intervening year and a half, the government has spoken about the history of slavery, in various ways, in multiple places, and with different people and groups.
In Suriname last September, I learned how deeply history still affects people’s daily lives, including spirituality.
I also learned how experiences, memories, and feelings could be different for each group and each individual.
It makes a difference whether your forebears were stolen from Africa or were members of the indigenous population.
It makes a difference in which country or region they live their lives.
And it also makes a difference in which period they lived.
Those historical, geographical, and cultural differences between population groups and individuals matter to this day.
And this means that making general statements about the history of slavery is very delicate.
How do you do justice to all those differences?
What is the best moment?
How do you do justice to all the spiritual symbols and rituals necessary to particular cultures?
And how can you encapsulate so much injustice, so much pain, and so many atrocities in mere words?
Any attempt to do so will always fall short and give rise to new questions and discussions.
With all the emotions that entail.
With all the tensions it creates.
We know there isn’t one right moment for everyone; there are no right words for everyone, nor one right place for everyone.
And I acknowledge that the build-up to this day could have been better.
But we mustn’t let that be a reason to do nothing.
We must take steps forward together.
We must progress together.
So please, let’s have that conversation about the Netherlands’ role in the history of slavery, even if it is difficult.
That conversation begins with acknowledgment.
Acknowledgment of the terrible suffering inflicted on generations of enslaved people.
Acknowledgment and rehabilitation of all those who resist, like the courageous Maroons of Suriname.
Today, I respectfully speak the names of Tula on Curaçao, Jolicoeur, Boni, Baron in Suriname, and One-Tété Lohkay on St Maarten.
And we remember all the nameless women and men who courageously strived for freedom throughout the centuries and often suffered the most horrific punishments.
And, of course, acknowledge historical responsibility, together with the appropriate words.
These words.
For centuries, the Dutch State and its representatives facilitated, stimulated, preserved, and profited from slavery.
For centuries, in the name of the Dutch State, human beings were made into commodities, exploited, and abused.
For centuries, under Dutch state authority, human dignity was violated in the most horrific way possible.
And successive Dutch governments after 1863 failed to adequately see and acknowledge that our slavery past continued to have adverse effects and still does.
For that, I offer the apologies of the Dutch government.
Today I apologize.
Awe mi ta pidi diskulpa.
Tide mi wani taki pardon.
Today, on behalf of the Dutch government, I apologize for the past actions of the Dutch State: to enslaved people in the past, everywhere in the world, who suffered as a consequence of those actions, as well as to their daughters and sons, and all their descendants, up to the present day.
We are doing this not to wipe the slate clean.
Not to close the book on the past and leave it behind us.
We are doing this – and doing it now – so we can find a way forward together, standing on the cusp of a critical commemorative year.
We not only share a past; we share a future too.
So, with this apology, we are writing not a full stop but a comma.
The dialogue on the history of slavery should be held as broadly as possible, not only in the Netherlands but also, and especially, in the places where it happened, with everyone who is involved or feels involved.
That’s why the apology I just offered will be echoed today in seven other places in the world, places where the pain and consequences of slavery are felt the most and are the most visible to this very day.
It will be echoed in words spoken by seven representatives of the Dutch government.
In Suriname.
On Curaçao.
On St Maarten.
On Aruba.
On Bonaire.
On Saba.
And on St Eustatius.
“We are doing this – and doing it now – so we can find a way forward together, standing on the cusp of an important commemorative year. We not only share a past; we share a future too. So, with this apology, we are writing not a full stop, but a comma.”
In consultation with all the groups and individuals from all the countries with which we share this history, the government wants to work more intensively to enhance knowledge of the history of slavery, thus ensuring more awareness, acknowledgment, and understanding.
This process will take time, and we can only do this work together.
On the road to that critical, symbolic date of 1 July 2023.
And then throughout the year of commemoration.
And in the years that follow.
The government response to the report by the Slavery History Dialogue Group discusses this extensively.
The steps we take now must be indeed taken together.
By talking and listening to each other and doing so with just one purpose: doing justice to the past and healing in the present.
A comma, not a full stop.
Together with Suriname, the Caribbean parts of the Kingdom, and all the descendants in the Netherlands, we are working to make cultural heritage more visible, foster awareness through education, and encourage academic historical research.
During the year of commemoration, all facets of the history of slavery and its effects up to the present day will be brought to light.
The King feels very engaged with this subject and will be present at the commemoration and celebration in Amsterdam on 1 July.
And we are looking ahead beyond 2023.
An independent and broadly composed commemoration committee will consider the best way to respectfully commemorate the past as collectively as possible in the future.
We will also set up a fund for social initiatives throughout the Kingdom and in Suriname so that the impact of the history of slavery is given the necessary visibility, attention, and action.
The healing process must start now, and we will write the program together.
Ladies and gentlemen,
The book of our shared history has many pages that fill us – as people of the 21st century – with dismay and horror.
And with deep shame.
Those pages cannot be erased with an apology, nor should they be.
We cannot change the past, but we can face up to it.
What the government fervently hopes, and what I personally fervently hope, is that this moment, this day, will help us – throughout the Kingdom and with Suriname and other countries – to fill the empty pages that lie ahead with dialogue, acknowledgment, and healing.
Thank you.
But as his family gathered with hundreds of mourners for his funeral on Wednesday, relatives said they were searching for meaning in the killing of Mr. Nichols at the hands of Memphis police officers who pulled him from his car and severely beat him.
His mother, Row Vaughn Wells, said she was sustained by the idea that her son had been part of a divine mission — “sent here on assignment from God” to change how the police operated in Memphis and around the country.
“I guess now his assignment is done,” Ms. Wells said from the pulpit at Mississippi Boulevard Christian Church, “and he’s been taken home.”
_________________
Related Articles Recently Posted on www.buildingthebridgefoundation.com:
Our Friday News Analysis | 'In Search of a Nation's Soul (Part 20),' 27 January 2023.
Our Wednesday News Analysis | 'The myth of the ‘cycle of violence’,' 1 February 2023.
The Evangelical Pope| 'Receive to Give,' 30 January 2023.
The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of the Building the Bridge Foundation, The Hague.
LATEST OPEN LETTERS
- 05-06A Call to Action: Uniting for a Lasting Peace in the Holy Land
- 28-05Concerned world citizen
- 13-02World Peace
- 05-12My scream to the world
- 16-11To Syria and Bashar al-Assad
- 16-11To Palestine
- 24-10Japan should withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN), WHO's controlling parent body, to protect the basic human rights and lives of its citizens.
- 09-08Open Letter to António Guterres: Will the UN Protect Our Rights and End Our Suffering?
- 09-06Urgent Appeal
- 07-05Protect Our Great Earth And Nation!
Latest Blog Articles
- 29-10How Palestinians see their future and their past
- 29-10Israel wants to close the circle of history in Gaza
- 29-10Palestine Letter: The struggle never ends
- 28-10The Evangelical Pope | Hungry and Thirsty for Justice
- 24-10Our Friday News Analysis | What the World Reads Now!
- 23-10Our Wednesday News Analysis | Opinion | If Sinwar Was a Devil, What Does It Make Israel?
- 22-10Opinion | If Sinwar Was a Devil, What Does It Make Israel?
- 22-10War on Gaza: How Starmer's Labour government has enabled Israel's genocide
- 22-10Arab states are coming together to prevent a regional war, will the U.S. listen?
- 21-10The Evangelical Pope | Steadfast Faithfulness to Our Roots
- 17-10Our Friday News Analysis | What the World Reads Now!